Abuse filter management

From Ryzom Commons

Abuse Filter navigation (Home | Recent filter changes | Examine past edits | Abuse log)
Jump to: navigation, search

Back to filter editor | Back to filter history

Differences between versions

ItemVersion from 13:11, 16 April 2012 by SirCotareVersion from 13:33, 16 April 2012 by SirCotare
Basic information

Description:

(publicly viewable)
 
Large deletion from article by new editors
 
Large deletion from article by new editors
Flags:
 
Enabled
 
Enabled
Notes:
 
fixing the part about recent contributor.. <nixeagle>
 
fixing the part about recent contributor.. <nixeagle>
  
 
No, that was the intended logic, to test whether the user is The Only contributor.  Putting that back.  Deleting from a page you created should be fine, but blanking from an established page just because you edited it previously generally would not be. - Dragons_flight
 
No, that was the intended logic, to test whether the user is The Only contributor.  Putting that back.  Deleting from a page you created should be fine, but blanking from an established page just because you edited it previously generally would not be. - Dragons_flight
  
 
Restoring Prodego's edit. - DF
 
Restoring Prodego's edit. - DF
 
Thanks for the talk page note DF / Don't trip if it is a full blank, overlaps with filter 3 -Prodego
 
Thanks for the talk page note DF / Don't trip if it is a full blank, overlaps with filter 3 -Prodego
  
 
Changed from "new editor" to "non-autoconfirmed editor" for clarity. -xeno
 
Changed from "new editor" to "non-autoconfirmed editor" for clarity. -xeno
  
 
optimizing - Hersfold
 
optimizing - Hersfold
  
 
I increased the threshold to -2000 to decrease the number of hits - Ruslik0
 
I increased the threshold to -2000 to decrease the number of hits - Ruslik0
  
 
Fixing the recent contributors thing; this is a string of up to ten users, so != doesn't work. - hersfold
 
Fixing the recent contributors thing; this is a string of up to ten users, so != doesn't work. - hersfold
  
 
exception for 69.226.103.13 - Cen
 
exception for 69.226.103.13 - Cen
  
 
NO! Do not exempt particular IPs, its a waste of checks. If they want exemption, they can create an account. Its free -Prodego
 
NO! Do not exempt particular IPs, its a waste of checks. If they want exemption, they can create an account. Its free -Prodego
  
 
Increased threshold to 5000. - Ruslik
 
Increased threshold to 5000. - Ruslik
 
Closed gap between filter 3 and filter 30 - previously could reduce articles to exactly 50 without triggering. RF
 
Closed gap between filter 3 and filter 30 - previously could reduce articles to exactly 50 without triggering. RF
  
 
Added action check, so it'll stop pinging on AFT comments. - rsterbin
 
Added action check, so it'll stop pinging on AFT comments. - rsterbin
Filter conditions
Conditions:
 
!"autoconfirmed" in user_groups
 
!"autoconfirmed" in user_groups
 
& new_size >= 50
 
& new_size >= 50
 
& article_namespace == 0
 
& article_namespace == 0
 
& edit_delta < -5000
 
& edit_delta < -5000
 
& !user_name in article_recent_contributors  
 
& !user_name in article_recent_contributors  
 
& !"#redirect" in lcase(added_lines)
 
& !"#redirect" in lcase(added_lines)
 
& !(lcase(summary) rlike "\bcop(y|ied)|und(id|o)|\brv[vt]?\b|revert|vandal|remov|clean|delet|\brmv?\b|\brepea?t")
 
& !(lcase(summary) rlike "\bcop(y|ied)|und(id|o)|\brv[vt]?\b|revert|vandal|remov|clean|delet|\brmv?\b|\brepea?t")
 
& !(length(summary) > 60)
 
& !(length(summary) > 60)
 
& action != 'feedback'
 
& action != 'feedback'
Actions to take when matched
Actions to take when matched
 
Tag: blanking
 
Tag: blanking
Warn: abusefilter-warning-removal
+
Warn: abusefilter-warning